South Dakota’s political system is messed up. We don’t let a large number of independent voters play a meaningful role in our publicly financed primary elections. Meanwhile, the Republican dominated legislature is skewed well to the right of traditional South Dakota values and is increasingly dysfunctional as it battles internally. Luckily, there is a straightforward fix available for much of what is wrong with South Dakota politics: open primaries.
Our Illegitimate Election System
We inherited an election system that no longer seems fair or appropriate. It is dominated by two political parties whose relevance is diminishing. The parties control our state election laws and the process for running elections. They make the rules and hold their own primary elections at public expense. For the most part, Republicans put forward candidates beholden to the political establishment and the Democrats do the same. No one is motivated to prioritize what regular South Dakotans want.
At the same time, tens of thousands of South Dakota voters have chosen to not affiliate with either party. Many of them are young people, turned off by the bickering of their parent’s political parties. So, they are punished by having little if any influence on who represents them in Pierre or D.C.
This legacy election system is not democratic. It wasn’t contemplated by the founding fathers. It doesn’t derive from the constitution. It evolved politically long ago and may have worked okay in the mid-20th century when politics were mostly conducted out of the public eye. But then the world changed. Politics got more transparent and intense with the arrival of the internet, social media and 24/7 news. Now we can all see that something is seriously wrong with our political system. Thank goodness, we can do something about it.
Back to Basics
Let’s go back to basics. The purpose of an election system is to select leaders and representatives. Given our strong democratic tradition in South Dakota, our elections should be fair, transparent and open to all, regardless of political persuasion. Preferably, the system should produce winners who feel an obligation to represent or lead all the people, not just a partisan minority. Open primaries would do all of that.
I am part of a group called South Dakota Open Primaries. We are proposing an open primary election covering the three congressional offices, the governor, the legislature and county offices. It would be a South Dakota primary. Not a Republican primary nor a Democrat primary. All registered voters would get to vote. All candidates for an office would run against each other in the primary, with the top two advancing to the general election. Here’s an example of how it might play out.
All candidates for an office, say governor, would run against each other in a single June South Dakota primary. There might be half a dozen candidates, maybe three Republicans, two Democrats and an independent. All registered voters would get to vote in the primary. That seems fair since the public pays for those primary elections. The two candidates with the most votes would advance to the November general election.
In a red state like ours, that might mean two Republicans could occasionally advance to the finals. But since Republicans are only half the registered voters in the state, it shouldn’t happen often. But if it does occur, Democrats, Independents and moderate Republicans would likely push the more moderate of the two candidates to victory. In all events, candidates would be wise to structure campaigns to appeal broadly to all South Dakotans, and not just their party faithful.
All Voters Get to Vote
But the most critical point, and it is worth emphasizing, is that all South Dakota voters would get to vote in the open primaries. No one would be left out of the publicly financed election. Independents would finally have a meaningful role in the process. Seems fairer than our current system, doesn’t it? But not everyone would like it.
Strident, hardline partisans do not do well in such an openly competitive system. They currently have control of our politics and are reluctant to give it up. So, we suspect we may eventually hear objections from politicos on both sides of the aisle about this proposed improvement. But we hope their objections are transparent to voters.
We Are Just Getting Started
South Dakota Open Primaries is just starting this two-year process to improve South Dakota elections. We have filed our proposed constitutional amendment with the state and hope to have it finalized in a couple months. We will be gathering signatures in 2023 and then working to win public support in 2024. After this change is approved, it will make a big difference in 2026 in South Dakota’s first open primary election. After all, open primaries let all voters vote!
Extremely proud to be working on this proposed constitutional amendment.
Excellent, just what SD needs!!
Nailed it with “publicly funded elections.” As an Independent who chooses to vote for the experience and character of the candidate, my choice should not be shut out by the SD Republican Party during primaries.
Voter Registration – Voting: South Dakota Secretary of Statehttps://sdsos.gov › voting › register-to-vote
Registration & Voting · The South Dakota Democratic Primary is open to registered Democrats and Independents/No Party Affiliation voters, but not Republicans.
Open primaries are long over due. Thanks for spearheading this
Sounds like a reasonable approach to improving voter involvement. Have you considered adding rank choice voting to the mix?
Alaska uses a combination of RCV and open primaries. We couldn’t consider that option because of the “single subject” rule the legislature put in place.
RCV just elected a moderate always squishy Republican Senator and Democrat to the House who got 38% of the inital vote. Total failure fir a state that is overwhemingly Republican. RCV is just another liberal idea to water down votes and ekect Democrats or weak Republicans.
This is an insanely stupid idea. You don’t want republicans fighting each other so you’re gonna open on the primaries up and elect more democrats??! how stupid can you get?
SD is unusual vis a vis the upper midwest in that it has closed primaries. Is there a simple explanation for this? I ‘m reminded of SD’s unusual (again, vis a vis upper midwest) banking history where SD allowed branch banking whereas others were “unit banking” states. Long ago (when the branching issue was still relevant and I was teaching a course on money, banking and financial institutions) I was unable to find a clear explanation. I moved away, not expecting to return, and lost interest in the question. I always assumed it was propagated by vested interest(s). Are closed primaries just another expression of the vested interests?
We are full time RVer’s. Yes we travel all winter and hole up somewhere in the summer. Most of us are conservative and independent. We are proud South Dakota residents and found out the hard way about not being able to vote for Taffy Howard in the primary. In the Rapid City area there are about 50K Rver’s registered as residents. 25K with Americas Mailbox and 25K with escapes approximately. Sioux Falls has about 50k registered as South Dakota residents. Our 100K citizens could make a difference in any election and nobody seems to care about us! Making open primaries happen would allow us independents to stay independent. We are contemplating change to the GOP to at least start working to change South Dakota more conservative on a national level with real members of congress be for South Dakota not to get rich and screw its citizens.